Category Archives: AWS

Migrating resources from AWS to Microsoft Azure

Kloud Blog

Kloud receives a lot of communications in relation to the work we do and the content we publish on our blog. My colleague Hugh Badini recently published a blog about Azure deployment models from which we received the following legitimate follow up question…

So, Murali, thanks for letting us know you’d like to know more about this… consider this blog a starting point :).

Firstly though…

this topic (inter-cloud migrations), as you might guess, isn’t easily captured in a single blog post, nor, realistically in a series, so what I’m going to do here is provide some basics to consider. I may not answer your specific scenario but hopefully provide some guidance on approach.

Every cloud has a silver lining

The good news is that if you’re already operating in a…

View original post 926 more words

The False Promise of Cloud Auto-scale

Go to the cloud because it has an ability to scale elastically.

You’ve read that bit before right?

Certainly if you’ve been involved in anything remotely cloud related in the last few years you will most certainly have come across the concept of on-demand or elastic scaling. Azure has it, AWS has it, OpenStack has it.  It’s one of the cornerstone pieces of any public cloud platform.

Interestingly it’s also one of the facets of the cloud that I see often misunderstood by developers and IT Pros alike.

In this post I’ll explore why auto-scale isn’t black magic and why your existing applications can’t always just automagically start using it.

What is “Elastic Scalability”?

Gartner (2009) defines it as follows:

“Scalable and Elastic: The service can scale capacity up or down as the consumer demands at the speed of full automation (which may be seconds for some services and hours for others). Elasticity is a trait of shared pools of resources. Scalability is a feature of the underlying infrastructure and software platforms. Elasticity is associated with not only scale but also an economic model that enables scaling in both directions in an automated fashion. This means that services scale on demand to add or remove resources as needed.”


Sounds pretty neat – based on demand you can utilise platform features to scale out your application automatically.  Notice I didn’t say scale up your application.  Have a read of this Wikipedia article if you need to understand the difference.

On Microsoft Azure, for example, we have some cool sliders and thresholds we can use to determine how we can scale out our deployed solutions.

Azure Auto Scale Screenshot

Scale this service based on CPU or on a schedule.

What’s Not to Understand?

In order to answer this we should examine how we’ve tended to build and operate applications in the on-premise world:

  • More instances of most software means more money for licenses. While you might get some cost relief for warm or cold standby you are going to have to pony up the cash if you want to run more than a single instance of most off-the-shelf software in warm or hot standby mode.
  • Organisations have shied away from multi-instance applications to avoid needing to patch and maintain additional operating systems and virtualisation hosts (how many “mega” web servers are running in your data centre that host many web sites?)
  • On-premise compute resources are finite (relative to the cloud).  Tight control of used resources leads to the outcome in the previous point – consolidation takes place because that hardware your company bought needs to handle the next 3 years of growth.
  • Designing and building an application that can run in a multi-instance configuration can be hard (how many web sites are you running that need “sticky session” support on a load balancer to work properly?)  Designing and building applications that are stateless at some level may be viewed by many as black magic!

The upshot of all these above points is that we have tended to a “less is more” approach when building or operating solutions on premise.  The simplest mode of hosting the application in a way that meets business availability needs is typically the one that gets chosen. Anything more is a luxury (or a complete pain to operate!)

So, How to Realise the Promise?

In order to fully leverage auto-scale capabilities we need to:

  • Adopt off-the-shelf software that provides a consumption-based licensing model. Thankfully in many cases we are already here – we can run many enterprise operating system, application and database software solutions using a pay-as-you-go (PAYG) scheme.  I can bring my own license if I’ve already paid for one too.  Those vendors who don’t offer this flexibility will eventually be left behind as it will become a competitive advantage for others in their field.
  • Leverage programmable infrastructure via automation and a culture shift to “DevOps” within our organisations.  Automation removes the need for manual completion of many operational tasks thus enabling auto-scale scenarios.  The new collaborative structure of DevOps empowers our operational teams to be more agile and to deliver more innovative solutions than they perhaps have done in the past.
  • Be clever about measuring what our minimum and maximum thresholds are for acceptable user experience.  Be prepared to set those CPU sliders lower or higher than you might otherwise have if you were doing the same thing on-premise.  Does the potential beneficial performance of auto-scale at a lower CPU utilisation level out-weigh the marginally small cost you pay given that the platform will scale back as necessary?
  • Start building applications for the cloud.  If you’ve designed and built applications with many stateless components already then you may have little work to do.  If you haven’t then be prepared to deal with the technical debt to fix (or start over).  Treat as much of your application’s components as you can as cattle and minimise the pets (read a definition that hopefully clears up that analogy).

So there we have a few things we need to think about when trying to realise the potential value of elastic scalability.  The bottom line is your organisation or team will need to invest time before moving to the cloud to truly benefit from auto-scale once there.  You should also be prepared to accept that some of what you build or operate may never be suitable for auto-scale, but that it could easily benefit from manual scale up or out as required (for example at end of month / quarter / year for batch processing).


Tagged , , , , ,

Quick Links To Help You Learn About Developing For The Cloud

Unsurprisingly I think the way Cloud Computing is transforming the IT industry is also leading to easier ways to learn and develop skills about the Cloud. In this post I’m going to give a run down on what I think some of the best ways are to start dipping your toe into this space if you haven’t already.

Sign up for a free trial

This is easy AND low cost. Turn up to the sign-up page for most major players and you’ll get free or low-cost services for a timed period. Sure, you couldn’t start the next Facebook at this level, but it will give you enough to start to learn what’s on offer.  You can run VMs, deploy solutions, utilise IaaS, PaaS and SaaS offerings and generally kick the tyres of the features of each. At time of writing these are:

Learn the APIs and use the SDKs

Each of Amazon, Azure, Google, Office 365 and Rackspace offer some form of remote programmable API (typically presented as REST endpoints).  If you’re going to move into Cloud from traditional hosting or system development practices then starting to learn about programmable infrastructure is a must.  Understanding the APIs available will depend on leveraging existing documentation:

If you aren’t a fan of working so close to the wire you can always leverage one of the associated SDKs in the language of your choice:

The great thing about having .Net support is you can then leverage those SDKs directly in PowerShell and automate a lot of items via scripting.

Developer Tool Support

While having an SDK is fine there’s also a need to support developers within whatever IDE they happen to be using.  Luckily you get support here too:

Source Control and Release Management

The final piece of the puzzle and one not necessarily tied to the individual Cloud providers is where to put your source code and how to deploy it.

  • Amazon Web Services: You can leverage Elastic Beanstalk for deployment purposes (this is a part of the Visual Studio and Eclipse toolkits).
  • Google App Engine: Depending on language you have a few options for auto-deploying applications using command-line tools from build scripts.  Eclipse tooling (covered above) also provides deployment capabilities.
  • Rackspace Cloud: no publicly available information on build and deploy.
  • Windows Azure: You can leverage deployment capabilities out of Visual Studio (probably not the best solution though) or utilise the in-built Azure platform support to deploy from a range of hosted source control providers such as BitBucket (Git or Mercurial), Codeplex, Dropbox (yes, I know), GitHub or TFS.  A really strong showing here from the Azure platform!

So, there we have it – probably one of the most link-heavy posts you’ll ever come across – hopefully the links will stay valid for a while yet!  If you spot anything that’s dead or that is just plain wrong leave me a comment.


Tagged , ,

Clean Backups Using Windows Server Backup and EBS Snapshots

One of the powerful features of AWS is the ability to snapshot any EBS volume you have operating. The challenge when utilising Windows 2008 R2 is that NTFS doesn’t support point-in-time snapshotting which can result in an inconsistent EBS snapshot. You can still create a snapshot but it may be that one or more file that was mid-change may not be accurate (or usable) in the resulting snapshot.

How to solve

The answer, it turns out, is fairly easy (if a little convoluted) – Windows Server Backup PLUS EBS snapshots.

In order for this to work you will need:

1. Windows Server Backup installed on your Instance (this does not require a reboot on install).

2. An appropriately sized EBS volume to support your intended backup (see the Technet arcticle on how to work out your allowance – remember you can always create a new volume later if you get the size wrong!)

3. Windows Task Scheduler (who needs Quartz or cron ;)).

4. Some Powershell Foo.

Volume Shadow Copy using the new EBS Volume

Once you have created your new EBS volume and attached it to the Instance you want to backup, open up Windows Server Backup and select what you want to backup (full, partial, custom – to be honest you shouldn’t need to do a “bare metal” backup….)  Note that Windows Server Backup will delete *everything* on the target EBS volume and it will no longer show up in Windows Explorer – it will still be attached and show up in Disk Manager, but you can’t copy files to or from it.

The benefit of Windows Server Backup is that it will utilise Windows Volume Shadow Copy Service (VSS)  resulting in a clean copy of files – even those in-flight at the time of backup.  This gets around the inability to “freeze” NTFS at runtime.

Set your schedule and save the backup.

Snapshot the backup volume

Now you have a nice clean static copy of the filesystem you can go ahead and create an EBS snapshot.  The best way I found to schedule this was to use some Powershell magic written by the guys over at  I slightly modified the Daily Snapshot Powershell to snapshot a pre-defined Instance and Volume by calling the CreateSnapshotForInstance function that takes an Instance and Volume identifier.  The great thing with this script setup is it auto-manages the expiry of old snapshots so my S3 usage doesn’t just keep on growing.

I invoke this Powershell on the success of the initial Windows Server Backup scheduled task by using the Task Scheduling – see this post at Binary Royale on how to do this (they send an email – I use the same approach to do a snapshot instead).

The great thing about the Powershell is that it will send you an email once completed – I have also setup mail notifications at completion of the Windows Server Backup (success, failure, disk full) so I can know when / if the backup fails at an early stage.  Note that in Windows Server 2008 R2 you can send an email right in Windows Task Scheduler – on AWS you’ll need to have an IIS smart host up and running to support this though – see my earlier post on how to set up a IIS SES relay host.


The benefit of this approach is a consistent state for your backup contents as well as an easy way to do a controlled restore at a later date (“create volume from snapshot” in the AWS management console and then attach to an Instance).  Additionally you achieve a reasonably reliable backup for not much more than the cost of EBS I/O and S3 I/O and storage costs.

Hope you find this useful.

Tagged , , , ,

Gone in 60 Seconds – Cloud Load Balancing Timeouts

Update: July 2014: AWS announced that customers can now manage ELB timeouts.  Read more here:

After what seems like ages we finally managed to get to the bottom of the weird issues we were having with a load balanced instance of Umbraco hosted at Amazon Web Services.  Despite having followed Umbraco’s load balancing guide and extensively tested we were seeing some weird behaviours for multi-page publishing and node copy operations.  Multiple threads were created for each request which lead to unexpected outcomes for users.

Eventually we managed to isolate this to the default (and unchangeable at time of writing) 60 second timeout behaviour of AWS’ ELB infrastructure combined with the long-running nature of the POST requests from Umbraco.  The easiest way to see the real side effect of the 60 second timeout is to put a debugging proxy like Fiddler or Charles between your browser and the ELB.  What we saw is below.


So, you can see the culprit right there in the red square – the call to the publish.aspx page is terminated at 60 seconds by the ELB which causes the browser to resubmit it – Ouch!  This also occurs when you copy or move nodes and the process exceeds 60 seconds – you get multiple nodes!

To be clear – this is not a problem that is isolated to Umbraco – there is a lot of software that relies on long-running HTTP POST operations with the expectation that they will run to completion.

Now there are probably a range of reasons why AWS has this restriction – the forum posts (dating back to 2009) don’t enlighten but it’s not hard to see why, in an “elastic” environment anything that takes a long time to complete may be a bad thing (you can’t “scale up” your ELB if it’s still processing a batch of long-running requests).  I can see the logic to this restriction – it simplifies the problems the AWS engineers need to solve, but it does introduce a limitation that isn’t covered clearly enough in any official AWS documentation.

The real solution here has to come from better software design that takes into account this limitation of the infrastructure and makes use of patterns like Post-Redirect-Get to submit a short POST request to initiate the process on the server, redirect to another page and then utilise async calls from the browser to check on the status of the process.

Yes, I know, we could probably run our own instances with HA Proxy on, but why build more infrastructure to manage when what’s there is perfectly fit for purpose?

Updated – You Have An Alternative

10 September – I’ve been lucky enough to be attending the first AWS Achitecture course run by Amazon here in Sydney and the news on this front is interesting.  By default you get 60 seconds, *but* you can request (via your AWS Account Manager or Architect) that this timeout be increased up to 17 minutes maximum.  This is applied on a per-ELB basis so if you create more ELB instances you would need to make the same request to AWS.

My advice: fix your application before you ask for a non-standard ELB setup.

Update: July 2014: AWS announced that customers can now manage ELB timeouts.  Read more here:

Not Just For WS ELB

Now, chaps (and ladies), you also need to be aware that this issue will raise its head in Windows Azure as well but most likely after a longer duration.  A very obliquely written blog post on MSDN suggests it will be now be based on the duration AND the number of concurrent connections you have.

You have been warned!

Tagged , , ,

Bouquets and Brickbats for Amazon’s AWS

This week on April 3 we were lucky enough to have the AWS Lean Cloud bandwagon roll into town in Sydney.  We’re a heavy user and believer in Cloud (from any vendor) at TheFARM so our tech team physically went along to the event (yeah, I know, old hat right – should have watched it streamed online).

Amazon’s CTO Werner Vogels got up in his Chaos Monkey t-shirt and talked at length about AWS as a platform and how over the last three years there has been an explosion in its usage.  While recycling content from earlier presentations in 2011 Werner showed real passion about the mission he and his team are on.  He said he welcomed feedback of any type – especially from those who aren’t using the AWS platform – he wanted to know why, what was missing, what made those people choose not to venture into AWS.

Now this doesn’t apply to us – we’re already there as are some of our customers.  But, as Werner asked for it here’s some constructive feedback based on our experiences.

Documentation Accuracy

As the slides showed, through 2009, 2010 and 2011 Amazon added a lot of features to AWS.  That’s neat.  However, we often struggle to find the authoritative piece of information about a service or feature.  There’s always those forum posts that rank higher in search results than the actual documentation.  And the posts often provide accurate and insightful information that doesn’t always align with the documentation.  I think some of this is due to the rate of change – new or changed stuff comes online so often that the documentation updates lag behind.  I’d say that slowing down new service introduction to ensure that each new offering is properly supported at a documentation level would be an idea.  More-so given the volume of new(ish) AWS consumers versus (what I assume) is a relatively small support team.

No Public Roadmap

Will they, won’t they?  Yes, I know it’s commercially sensitive but how can I plan properly if I don’t know what’s coming?  And what’s with the “it’s just around the corner” posts that occur from time-to-time in response to questions in the forums?  I can’t plan with “just around the corner”.  I know being an SI partner would open up some of this information but if I’m not (or my customer isn’t) a partner how do we find that out?  Werner talked about how the platform is a great leveller and enabler for smaller businesses and start-ups but it does seem that only partners or larger customers are privy to important forward-looking information.  It shouldn’t be that way.

BTW, when will there be RDS for SQL Server?  Will there ever be a Region in Australia?

No Cookie Cutter

I know we have the AppHarbors and the Herokus of the world that make it easier for me to host than to go to raw AWS or Azure, but if Amazon wants to hit a sweet spot for the smaller end of the market then having a model that is similar what those guys are offering would be cool.  I understand the differences and the reasons why they don’t offer it but I think they should.  Most people don’t want to care about AMIs, EBS volumes, S3 storage buckets, etc.  They want to host their website in the cheapest configuration they can so it is highly available.  Sure, I can publish my static website directly from S3, but I still need to know what S3 is!  As an example I might want to migrate my small business website to AWS.  I know what technology it is built on and I have the source code – I should be able to check a few boxes on a web form that align with my knowledge and Amazon should provision the least cost option to host it (I can choose high availability if I want as an extra cost).


So I had a couple of more items I thought should feed in here too.

Usage Reconciliation

If you’ve ever used the Amazon AWS portal to retrieve usage stats you’ll quickly come to discover how hard it is to use the data that it provides (at time of writing).  You quickly discover that trying to work out what cost you actually incurred per usage item is nigh on impossible.  You almost have to take the bill you receive at face value.  I particularly found this annoying whenyou consider the excellent monthly usage calculator that is provided to work out costs in advance!

Delegated Authorisation

Man, this area needs some work!  One of our customers granted us access to various items within their account.  Think it meant we could do anything useful? Nope.  401 Denied. We are locked out of so much functionality it’s not funny.  Now this might be due to lack of understanding of how IAM and the permission system work, but I’d argue if it’s that hard for experienced IT professionals to get right then there is something fundamentally wrong in the design.

So that’s some thoughts and feedback for Werner!  The event was good and really showed the passion Amazon has for its offering (and how much local interest there is!)  The ability to hear from some “thought leaders” in the Lean space such as Eric Ries was also excellent.

Ultimately I think the clear message is that if you haven’t started a journey to the Cloud (whatever flavour) it’s time you should.

Tagged , , ,

Using Amazon SES for .Net Application Mail Delivery

Until March 2012 Amazon’s Simple Email Service (SES) had limited support for mail being sent via existing .Net code and the IIS SMTP virtual server.  Some recent changes mean this is now possible so in this post I’ll quickly cover how you can configure your existing apps to utilise SES.

If you don’t understand why you should be using SES for your applications then you should be looking at the Amazon SES FAQ and before you start any of this configuration you need to ensure that you have created your SMTP credentials on the AWS console and that you have an appropriately validated sender address (or addresses).  Amazon is really strict here as they don’t want to get blacklisted for being a spammer host.

IIS Virtual SMTP Server

Firstly, let’s look at how we can setup the SMTP server as a smart host that forwards mail on to SES for you.  This approach means that you can configure all your applications to forward via IIS rather than talking directly to the SES SMTP interface.

1. Open up the IIS 6 Manager and select the SMTP Virtual Server you want to configure.


2. Right-click on the server and select Properties.

3. In the Properties Window click on the Delivery tab.

4. On the Delivery tab click on the Outbound Security button on the bottom right.

5. In the Outbound Security dialog select “Basic Authentication” and enter your AWS SES Credentials.  Make sure you check the “TLS Encryption” box at the bottom left of the dialog.  Click OK. Your screen should look similar to this:


6. Now open the Advanced Delivery dialog by clicking on the button.

7. Modify the dialog so it looks similar to the below.  I put the internal DNS name for my host here – the problem with this is that if you shut off your Instance the name will change and you need to update this.  Click OK.


Now you should be ready to use this IIS SMTP Virtual Server as a relay for you applications to SES.  Make sure you set AWS SecurityGroups up correctly and that you are restricting which hosts can relay via your SMTP server.

Directly from .Net Code

Without utilising the Amazon AWS SDK for .Net you can also continue to send mail the way you always have – you will need to make the following change to your App.config or Web.config file.

      <smtp deliveryMethod="Network" from="">
          <network defaultCredentials="false"
                   password="xxxxxxxx" />

Thanks to the author of the March 11, 2012 post on this thread on the AWS support forums for the configuration file edits above.

With these two changes most “legacy” .Net applications should be able to utilise Amazon’s SES service for mail delivery.  Happy e-mailing!

Tagged , , , ,

Amazon AWS Elastic Load Balancers and MSBuild – BFF

Our jobs take us to some interesting places sometimes – me, well, recently I’ve spent a fair amount of time stuck in the land of Amazon’s cloud offering AWS.

Right now I’m working on a release process based around MSBuild that can deploy to a farm of web servers at AWS.  As with any large online offering ours makes use of load balancing to provide a reliable and responsive service across a set of web servers.

Anyone who has managed deployment of a solution in this scenario is most likely familiar with this approach:

  1. Remove target web host from load balancing pool.
  2. Update content on the web host and test.
  3. Return web host to load balancing pool.
  4. Repeat for all web hosts.
  5. (Profit! No?!)

Fantastic Elastic and the SDK

In AWS-land load balancing is provided by the Elastic Load Balancing (ELB) service which, like many of the components that make up AWS, provides a nice programmatic API in a range of languages.

Being focused primarily on .Net we are we are happy to see good support for it in the form of the AWS SDK for .NET.  The AWS SDK provides a series of client proxies and strongly-typed objects that can be used to programmatically interface with pretty much anything your AWS environment is running.

Rather than dive into the detail on the SDK I’d recommend downloading a copy and taking a look through the samples they have – note that you will need an AWS environment in order to actually test out code but this doesn’t stop you from reviewing the code samples.

Build and Depoy

As mentioned above we are looking to do minimal manual intervention deployments and are leveraging MSBuild to build, package and deploy our solution.  One item that is missing in this process is a way to take a target machine out of the load balancer pool so we can deploy to it.

I spent some time reviewing existing custom MSBuild task libraries that provide AWS support but it looks like many of them are out-of-date and haven’t been touched since early 2011.  AWS is constantly changing so being able to keep up with all it has to offer would probably require some effort!

The result is that I decided to create a few custom tasks so that I could use for registration / deregistration of EC2 Instances from one or more ELBs.

I’ve included a sample of a basic RegisterInstances custom task below to show you how you go about utilising the AWS SDK to register an Instance with an ELB.   Note that the code below works but that it’s not overly robust.

The things you need to know for this to work are:

  1. Your AWS Security Credentials (Access and Secret Keys).
  2. The names of the ELBs you want to register / deregister instances with.
  3. The names of the EC2 Instances to register / deregister.
using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Linq;
using System.Text;
using Microsoft.Build.Utilities;
using Microsoft.Build.Framework;
using Amazon.ElasticLoadBalancing;
using Amazon.ElasticLoadBalancing.Model;

namespace TheFarm.MsBuild.CustomTasks.Aws.Elb
    /// <summary>
    /// Register one or more EC2 Instance with one or more AWS Elastic Load Balancer.
    /// </summary>
    /// <remarks>Requires the AWS .Net SDK.</remarks>
    public class RegisterInstances : Task
         /// <summary>
         /// Gets or sets the load balancer names.
         /// </summary>
         /// <value>
         /// The load balancer names.
         /// </value>
         /// <remarks>The account associated with the AWS Access Key must have created the load balancer(s).</remarks>
         public ITaskItem[] LoadBalancerNames { get; set; }

         /// <summary>
         /// Gets or sets the instance identifiers.
         /// </summary>
         /// <value>
         /// The instance identifiers.
         /// </value>
         public ITaskItem[] InstanceIdentifiers { get; set; }

         /// <summary>
         /// Gets or sets the AWS access key.
         /// </summary>
         /// <value>
         /// The aws access key.
         /// </value>
         public ITaskItem AwsAccessKey { get; set; }

         /// <summary>
         /// Gets or sets the AWS secret key.
         /// </summary>
         /// <value>
         /// The aws secret key.
         /// </value>
         public ITaskItem AwsSecretKey { get; set; }

         /// <summary>
         /// Gets or sets the Elastic Load Balancing service URL.
         /// </summary>
         /// <value>
         /// The ELB service URL.
         /// </value>
         /// <remarks>Will typically take the form:</remarks>
         public ITaskItem ElbServiceUrl { get; set; }

         /// <summary>
         /// When overridden in a derived class, executes the task.
         /// </summary>
         /// <returns>
         /// true if the task successfully executed; otherwise, false.
         /// </returns>
         public override bool Execute()
                  // throw away - to test for valid URI.
                  new Uri(ElbServiceUrl.ItemSpec);

                  var config = new AmazonElasticLoadBalancingConfig { ServiceURL = ElbServiceUrl.ItemSpec };

                  using (var elbClient = new AmazonElasticLoadBalancingClient(AwsAccessKey.ItemSpec, AwsSecretKey.ItemSpec, config))
                        foreach (var loadBalancer in LoadBalancerNames)
                              Log.LogMessage(MessageImportance.Normal, "Preparing to add Instances to Load Balancer with name '{0}'.", loadBalancer.ItemSpec);

                              var initialInstanceCount = DetermineInstanceCount(elbClient, loadBalancer);

                              var instances = PrepareInstances();

                              var registerResponse = RegisterInstancesWithLoadBalancer(elbClient, loadBalancer, instances);

                              ValidateInstanceRegistration(initialInstanceCount, instances, registerResponse);

                              DetermineInstanceCount(elbClient, loadBalancer);
             catch (InvalidInstanceException iie)
                   Log.LogError("One or more supplied instances was invalid.", iie);
             catch (LoadBalancerNotFoundException lbe)
                   Log.LogError("The supplied Load Balancer could not be found.", lbe);
             catch (UriFormatException)
                   Log.LogError("The supplied ELB service URL is not a valid URI. Please confirm that it is in the format 'scheme://'");

             return !Log.HasLoggedErrors;

        /// <summary>
        /// Prepares the instances.
        /// </summary>
        /// <returns>List of Instance objects.</returns>
        private List<Instance> PrepareInstances()
            var instances = new List<Instance>();

            foreach (var instance in InstanceIdentifiers)
                Log.LogMessage(MessageImportance.Normal, "Adding Instance '{0}' to list.", instance.ItemSpec);

                instances.Add(new Instance { InstanceId = instance.ItemSpec });
            return instances;

        /// <summary>
        /// Registers the instances with load balancer.
        /// </summary>
        /// <param name="elbClient">The elb client.</param>
        /// <param name="loadBalancer">The load balancer.</param>
        /// <param name="instances">The instances.</param>
        /// <returns>RegisterInstancesWithLoadBalancerResponse containing response from AWS ELB.</returns>
        private RegisterInstancesWithLoadBalancerResponse RegisterInstancesWithLoadBalancer(AmazonElasticLoadBalancingClient elbClient, ITaskItem loadBalancer, List<Instance> instances)
            var registerRequest = new RegisterInstancesWithLoadBalancerRequest { Instances = instances, LoadBalancerName = loadBalancer.ItemSpec };

            Log.LogMessage(MessageImportance.Normal, "Executing call to add {0} Instances to Load Balancer '{1}'.", instances.Count, loadBalancer.ItemSpec);

            return elbClient.RegisterInstancesWithLoadBalancer(registerRequest);

        /// <summary>
        /// Validates the instance registration.
        /// </summary>
        /// <param name="initialInstanceCount">The initial instance count.</param>
        /// <param name="instances">The instances.</param>
        /// <param name="registerResponse">The register response.</param>
        private void ValidateInstanceRegistration(int initialInstanceCount, List<Instance> instances, RegisterInstancesWithLoadBalancerResponse registerResponse)
            var postInstanceCount = registerResponse.RegisterInstancesWithLoadBalancerResult.Instances.Count();

            if (postInstanceCount != initialInstanceCount + instances.Count)
                 Log.LogWarning("At least one Instance failed to register with the Load Balancer.");

        /// <summary>
        /// Determines the instance count.
        /// </summary>
        /// <param name="elbClient">The elb client.</param>
        /// <param name="loadBalancer">The load balancer.</param>
        /// <returns>integer containing the instance count.</returns>
        private int DetermineInstanceCount(AmazonElasticLoadBalancingClient elbClient, ITaskItem loadBalancer)
             var response = elbClient.DescribeLoadBalancers(new DescribeLoadBalancersRequest { LoadBalancerNames = new List<string> { loadBalancer.ItemSpec } });

             var initialInstanceCount = response.DescribeLoadBalancersResult.LoadBalancerDescriptions[0].Instances.Count();

             Log.LogMessage(MessageImportance.Normal, "Load Balancer with name '{0}' reports {1} registered Instances.", loadBalancer.ItemSpec, initialInstanceCount);

             return initialInstanceCount;

So now we have a task compiled into an assembly we can reference that assembly in our build script and invoke the task using the following syntax:

    <RegisterInstances LoadBalancerNames="LoadBalancerName1" InstanceIdentifiers="i-SomeInstance1" AwsAccessKey="YourAccessKey" AwsSecretKey="YourSecretKey" ElbServiceUrl="" />

That’s pretty much it… there are some vagaries to be aware of – the service call for deregistration of an Instance returns prior to the instance being fully de-registered with the load balancer so don’t key any deployment action directly off of that return – you should perform other checks first to make sure that the instance *is* no longer registered prior to deploying.

I hope you’ve found this post useful in showing you what is possible when combining the AWS SDK with the extensibility of MSBuild.

Tagged , , ,